Home Improvement Contractor - Licensed Contractors

the backwards theory?

The Big Bang theory has become one of the most popular theories for the formation of the universe. There are flaws with the theory, however. For one, destruction and chaos are the results of an explosion, not systematic order. A building contractor, for example, would not put all of his materials in a big pile along with a few sticks of dynamite, ignite the dynamite, and then expect the result to be a perfectly constructed office building. But this is what the Big Bang theory is essentially suggesting—that the ordered life we see today is the result of an explosion.

Public Comments

1. you are WAY off. Our universe does NOT contain "systematic order" at all! There are meteors hitting planets, black holes eating atoms....what on EARTH makes you say our world has "systematic order"? -Where is this "order" you see???? There is no "order" in our world! It IS in fact chaos!!!! -Next time you want to copy and paste some garbage off of a creationist website, at least give them credit.
2. Yes, I agree.
3. The order of planets and stars is due to random occurences on the quantum level over billions of years. The Big Bang did not create order. It spread the matter around, but didn't directly create the Earth or any other Heavenly body.
4. Of course. By Big Bang they mean the biggest pile of dynamite in history right? Where do these simplistic pseudo analysis come from?
5. A theory is still just theory, in any case Someone or Something (GOD) had to light the fuse.
6. Well, if you oversimplified it to the point of building it out of straw, then you'd be correct. Unfortunately, that's not how science works, I'm afraid.
7. The big bang theory was proved wrong by the "law' of the conservation of angular momentum.
8. It was not an explosion it was an expansion.
9. you are first assuming that there is order and organization in this universe. is it not possible that we are all the chaos and destruction of a perfectly ordered and organized white hot ball of infinite density?
10. If the contractors explosion blew a hole in the ground that collected water and life formed out of it....oh, nevermind.
11. As I have told you before, in the Religion section, you clearly don't understand big bang theory. Stop getting your answers and questions from Answers in Genesis and try picking up a physics book for once. It's quite obvious you have no idea what you're talking about.
12. You think the universe is anything but caotic??? You really should watch some documentaries on astronomy.
13. just theory and science so it doesnt belong here....we believe in creation youre trolling
14. No, it is actually the opposite. The Big Bang theory says that all matter was in a neat ball at first, then it quickly expanded...into chaos. It went from order to chaos, not the other way around. Human beings tend to see order even where there is none.
15. Order comes from chaos all the time; it's simply a property of the natural world. Who are all these people saying there's no order in the universe? Science is possible only because we observe repeatable, structured, ordered events and systems.
16. I beg to differ The Big Bang may be the way God chose to create some very important elements. Friend, you seem to be the same as me. You enjoy the scientific. Try: www.reasons.org These are old earth Creationists - they believe Jesus is Lord, Messiah, The Way . . . and they think that science is part of the tools God gave us and reveal many of "the reasons to believe."
17. The Universe isn't believed to be a "systematic" order. Most scientists believe that our Universe works on Chance and Probability. Which proves your theory wrong: If a carpenter piles up all of his materials in a big pile and tries to create a building by random explosion, it is entirely possible for the carpenter to create a perfect building. You see, everything and anything is possible when you are dealing with Chance and Probability. Why? Because Infinity Exists. I'm trying to prove your theory wrong with another theory of course. So we're both wrong. So stop arguing. No one will know how the Universe was formed. Where there is Theory, Doubt Follows.
18. Man, you just keep on reaching don't you? And yet you're constantly falling far short of anything remotely intelligent about this. LOGIC decrees that an act of destruction (i.e. assembling the known causes and conditions to destroy something) will tear something apart and an act of "construction" will use causes and conditions to put something together... but are construction and destruction really "finitely" defined? Now let's look at this Big Bang theory again (according to your POV)... and let's slip off your narrow goggles of perception of linear time for a moment, IF you TRULY dare... destruction can cause something else to come into existence. When YOU die, your body becomes the causes and conditions for a whole host of bacteria, worms and so forth to party hearty, then what's left of your body becomes fertilization (perhaps) for plants to grow... YOUR destruction has become a vast sea of life for other organisms.... So... you see? Your perception is WRONG and you really need to go back to square one, and the Big Bang THEORY is logical in various ways. _()_
19. Yes, your theory is backwards. The "order" we know is the only one that could exist because it is the only one that DOES exist. Assuming that your perceptions of this order are objective is simple hubris. In other words, if you did make your dynamite pile it would be without any other office building to compare it to. The new "order" would be whatever shape the finished product took; this on top of that, this distance from that, at such an angle, etc. And being the only "office building" in existence, it would now define what an office building is, and therefore it WOULD be perfectly constructed.
20. Definitely backwards theory, but not in the way you expect. The question should be, how did the perfect order of the Big Bang become today's clumpy universe? Because the Big Bang supposedly occurred only about twenty billion years ago, nothing in the cosmos can be older than this. Yet in 1986 astronomers discovered that galaxies compose huge agglomerations a billion light-years across; such mammoth clustering of matter must have taken a hundred billion years to form. Just as early geological theory, which sought to compress the earth's history into a biblical few thousand years crumbled when confronted with the aeons needed to build up a mountain range, so the concept of a Big Bang is undetermined by the existence of these vast and ancient superclusters of galaxies. These enormous ribbons of matter, whose reality was confirmed during 1990, also refute a basic premise of the Big Bang - that the universe was, at its origin, perfectly smooth and homogeneous. Theorists admit that they can see no way to get from the perfect universe of the Big Bang to the clumpy, imperfect universe of today. As one leading theorist, George Field of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, put it, "There is a real crisis".